The entire German team is getting credit for their victory, and one player from Argentina is getting all the blame.
Not Gonzalo Higuain or Rodrigo Palacio, who missed golden chances to take the lead.
Not Martin Demichelis, who lost his mark and allowed Mario Gotze to score.
All the blame is landing on Lionel Messi.
People are saying three things after the final: 1) Messi couldn't win the world cup, therefore he isn't the world's best player. 2) Messi in no way was the best player in the tournament and didn't deserve his award. And 3) Messi didn't win, killing his chances of being remembered as one of the best players of all time. I'll address all three arguments.
To be fair, Messi didn't have his best match in the Final. He really struggled to impose himself, and he missed a great chance to score in the second half when his shot dragged wide of the far post. As time wound down, Germany man-marked him and never let him get the ball.
It's too simplistic to say Messi failed to make an impact in the world's biggest match and therefore he isn't the world's best player. The fact is Messi DID have an impact on the match. He drew the constant attention of multiple German players with every run he made. Messi opened up spaces for Higuain and Palacio and Aguero and Lavezzi. That they couldn't take advantage of the extra space is not Messi's fault.
1) Does this loss mean Messi is no longer the world's best player?
This really shouldn't take much thought. Messi's main competition for the title of "best player in the world" is Cristiano Ronaldo of Portugal. Ronaldo didn't get out of the group stage.
If World Cup success/failure is the deciding factor, Messi certainly has a better case than Ronaldo.
If you believe Ronaldo to be the best player in the world, go ahead and make the argument, but don't use this World Cup as evidence in your favor.
I'll be happy to point out the man who won 3 consecutive Ballon d'Ors, the man who became Barcelona's all-time leading goalscorer at 24 years old, the man who scored 200 La Liga goals faster than any player in history, and the man who is just 8 goals short of becoming La Liga's all-time leading goalscorer, a record he will break before he turns 28.
Leo Messi is the best player in the world.
2) Did Messi have the best World Cup?
Again, this shouldn't take much thought. Messi wasn't even the best player on his own team in this tournament. That would go to Javier Mascherano, who provided constant protection as the shield in front of the Argentina defense. Pablo Zabaleta also could make a case that he had a better tournament than Messi. The fact is Argentina's defense shined all tournament. They only trailed in a match for the 8 final minutes of their World Cup. The attack only scored 8 goals.
Messi himself played well in the group stage (against some light competition), but failed to score in the knockout rounds. He simply didn't have as good a tournament as his peers, if you weigh the elimination games appropriately.
I wouldn't even put him in the Top 10. In addition to Mascherano and Zabaleta, Colombia's James Rodriguez, Germany's Phillip Lahm, Bastian Schweinsteiger, Mats Hummels, and Manuel Neuer, the Netherlands' Arjen Robben, Costa Rica's Keylor Navas, and Chile's Alexis Sanchez all could make a real case to say they had better tournaments than Messi.
Messi is still the best player in the world, but he didn't put together the best 7 matches in this tournament. He did not deserve the award he received (and by the look on his face, he didn't want it either).
3) Has Messi missed his chance to be known as the best player of all time?
I think there are two ways to look at this argument. One is, who would be better player if both were in their prime, on the pitch, at the same time? The second, perhaps more appropriate way to view the argument, is comparing players' careers.
There is strong evidence that advancements in fitness methods, nutrition, and technical coaching have significantly impacted the modern game. Basically, the entire pool of players is much better than they were 30 years ago.
One reason Maradona could run circles around players is because the players were easier to run around back then. They treated their bodies poorly and weren't as athletic as they are today. And they weren't coached to tackle as well.
Simply put, the players of today are more athletic, more fit, and coached better than the generations before them. Soccer has evolved. It is much more difficult to stand out as a superstar in the modern era than it was a generation ago.
The very fact that Messi is mentioned in the same breath as Pele or Maradona while playing in this era suggests that if they were able to face off against each other, Messi would be the best player on the pitch. And in that sense, yes, Messi is the best player of all time.
But will Messi have the best career in world soccer history?
This is a tougher argument. Messi already has the best La Liga career of all time, and I believe Messi will have best club career of all time when he hangs up his boots.
For those who view soccer as an Olympic-style event that only happens every four years (looking at you, US media) they might very well think only World Cup champions can be considered in the "greatest of all time" discussion.
This is obviously flawed logic, but it is clear he has not had as great an international career as the likes of Pele, Maradona, or Zidane.
Messi hasn't won a thing at senior international level. He won the U-21 World Cup, and the 2008 Olympics, but has never won the World Cup or the Copa America.
The question therefore becomes how much should international success weigh into the discussion?
Messi's success year-after-year at the club level is unparalleled. His failures at the international level are difficult to ignore (ironically, the woeful coaching of the Argentina team by Maradona 4 years ago has significantly hurt Messi's case in this regard).
Therefore, Messi's legacy will struggle to stand with the likes of Maradona, Pele, and Zidane when it's all said and done. Messi will be classified with the likes of Johann Cruyff, Paolo Maldini, Ferenc Puskas, Michel Platini, and Zico as one of the best players to never win a World Cup. Not a bad group to be in, but not in the top level either.
He does need a major trophy on the international level to cement his legacy. A great first step could happen next year in Chile at the Copa America. Then again at the Super Copa America in the US in 2016, which will combine 16 teams from North and South America. If Messi can lead Argentina to victories in these tournaments, perhaps he can take momentum into Russia 2018 and win the World Cup.
Messi will be 31 years old in that tournament, which will likely be his last real chance to add a World Cup to his resume. It won't be easy, as South American teams normally struggle in European tournaments.
In all likelihood, by failing to win on Sunday, Messi has missed his chance. Messi probably will not have the best soccer career of all time.
But that doesn't mean Messi isn't the best player the world has ever seen. He just won't have the best resume.
Showing posts with label World Cup. Show all posts
Showing posts with label World Cup. Show all posts
Tuesday, July 15, 2014
Monday, July 14, 2014
Germans Win, Dynasty in the Making?
In a match where Argentina had by far the best chances to score, Germany ended on top with a goal from substitute Mario Gotze in the second half of extra time.
It was a fitting finish to a great World Cup, a tournament where 32 goals were scored by substitutes, the most in World Cup history.
10 years ago, Germany was knocked out of their group in Euro 2004. Placed in a group with the Netherlands, Czech Republic, and Latvia--Germany failed to win a single match in the tournament, drawing twice (failing to score against Latvia) and losing to the Czechs.
Rudi Voller was the German coach for that tournament. His team played very conservatively, an approach that had worked for Germany in the past. Germany fought all the way to the World Cup Finals in 2002 by parking the bus. Goalkeeper Oliver Kahn was the player of the tournament in 2002, suggesting Germany was perhaps fortunate to get as far as they did. But failing to score against Latvia was undeniably a low point for German football, and Voller was sacked. Jurgen Klinsmann and Jogi Loew were brought in to overhaul the entire national setup and leave the parked bus behind.
They decided to nurture a new generation of players who could play fast, attacking football. They wanted to create a specific style, focusing on passing on the ground from defense to attack as quickly as possible to create what they called "dynamic football."
Klinsmann and Loew got a lot of help from the Bundesliga. The German federation put a lot of pressure on all the German clubs in both the first and second divisions to fund youth academies. Klinsmann and Loew held workshops with all of the Bundesliga clubs to outline their principles and encouraged the Bundesliga clubs to play this style.
Attacking football requires fitter players who can run further and faster, so Klinsmann and Loew asked to monitor the fitness of the German players every three months. This was unpopular among the Bundesliga clubs. No club wanted Klinsmann pointing the finger saying this club's players have been trained properly and this club's players haven't. No club wanted to subject themselves to that kind of oversight. But for the good of German football, they bought in to Klinsmann and Loew's vision and agreed to their requests.
Klinsmann's first and only German World Cup squad included his new breed of young players who had been trained to play his style from a young age. Phillip Lahm, Bastian Schweinsteiger, Per Mertesacker, and Lukas Podolski (average age 21 in 2006) played in every match for the Germans all the way to the semi-finals. It was an impressive performance for the Germans as many in the country feared a repeat of the embarrassment of Euro 2004.
From that point on the Germans have reached at least the semi finals of every major international competition: finalists in Euro 2008, and semifinalists in the 2010 World Cup and Euro 2012. Now they are finally champions.
Besides Miroslav Klose and backup goalkeeper Roman Weidenfeller; Lahm, Podolski, Schweinsteiger, and Mertesacker are now the experienced veterans in the German squad. Klinsmann and Loew's revolution has worked. Germany has cultivated a golden generation of talented players just hitting their prime.
Manuel Neuer is 28. Sami Khedira is 27. Leading scorer Thomas Muller is just 24. Playmakers Mesut Ozil and Toni Kroos are 25 and 24, respectively. Defenders Mats Hummels and Jerome Boateng are both just 25. Final hero Mario Gotze is 22. Dortmund left back Erik Durm is also just 22.
Marco Reus was injured before the tournament and missed the World Cup, but he might just be the best player Germany has, and he is only 25. The Bender twins, who also missed trips to Brazil due to injury, are also 25.
And there are more young Germans fighting to break into the team. Marc-Andre ter Stegen is just 22 and has already secured a move to Barcelona. Julian Draxler and Matthias Ginter, both just 20, were in the squad in Brazil and are tipped for big things in the future. Schalke teenagers Max Meyer and Leon Goretzka have great potential as well. And don't forget 19-year-old attacking midfielder Serge Gnabry, who took a real step forward for Arsenal last season.
More great young players will follow. And Germany will continue to be a real force. The question therefore is, will anyone catch them? With Spain and Italy in decline, Germany is the clear favorite to win Euro 2016 in France and the Russian World Cup in 2018.
Yesterday could just be the first of many achievements enjoyed by the Germans in the coming years with this group of young, excellent players. Germany has the makings of a dynasty that could enjoy the same 6-year period of success that Spain just did.
And for this embarrassment of riches, all credit should go to to Klinsmann and Loew--the masterminds of German's football revolution a decade ago.
It was a fitting finish to a great World Cup, a tournament where 32 goals were scored by substitutes, the most in World Cup history.
10 years ago, Germany was knocked out of their group in Euro 2004. Placed in a group with the Netherlands, Czech Republic, and Latvia--Germany failed to win a single match in the tournament, drawing twice (failing to score against Latvia) and losing to the Czechs.
Rudi Voller was the German coach for that tournament. His team played very conservatively, an approach that had worked for Germany in the past. Germany fought all the way to the World Cup Finals in 2002 by parking the bus. Goalkeeper Oliver Kahn was the player of the tournament in 2002, suggesting Germany was perhaps fortunate to get as far as they did. But failing to score against Latvia was undeniably a low point for German football, and Voller was sacked. Jurgen Klinsmann and Jogi Loew were brought in to overhaul the entire national setup and leave the parked bus behind.
They decided to nurture a new generation of players who could play fast, attacking football. They wanted to create a specific style, focusing on passing on the ground from defense to attack as quickly as possible to create what they called "dynamic football."
Klinsmann and Loew got a lot of help from the Bundesliga. The German federation put a lot of pressure on all the German clubs in both the first and second divisions to fund youth academies. Klinsmann and Loew held workshops with all of the Bundesliga clubs to outline their principles and encouraged the Bundesliga clubs to play this style.
Attacking football requires fitter players who can run further and faster, so Klinsmann and Loew asked to monitor the fitness of the German players every three months. This was unpopular among the Bundesliga clubs. No club wanted Klinsmann pointing the finger saying this club's players have been trained properly and this club's players haven't. No club wanted to subject themselves to that kind of oversight. But for the good of German football, they bought in to Klinsmann and Loew's vision and agreed to their requests.
Klinsmann's first and only German World Cup squad included his new breed of young players who had been trained to play his style from a young age. Phillip Lahm, Bastian Schweinsteiger, Per Mertesacker, and Lukas Podolski (average age 21 in 2006) played in every match for the Germans all the way to the semi-finals. It was an impressive performance for the Germans as many in the country feared a repeat of the embarrassment of Euro 2004.
From that point on the Germans have reached at least the semi finals of every major international competition: finalists in Euro 2008, and semifinalists in the 2010 World Cup and Euro 2012. Now they are finally champions.
Besides Miroslav Klose and backup goalkeeper Roman Weidenfeller; Lahm, Podolski, Schweinsteiger, and Mertesacker are now the experienced veterans in the German squad. Klinsmann and Loew's revolution has worked. Germany has cultivated a golden generation of talented players just hitting their prime.
Manuel Neuer is 28. Sami Khedira is 27. Leading scorer Thomas Muller is just 24. Playmakers Mesut Ozil and Toni Kroos are 25 and 24, respectively. Defenders Mats Hummels and Jerome Boateng are both just 25. Final hero Mario Gotze is 22. Dortmund left back Erik Durm is also just 22.
Marco Reus was injured before the tournament and missed the World Cup, but he might just be the best player Germany has, and he is only 25. The Bender twins, who also missed trips to Brazil due to injury, are also 25.
And there are more young Germans fighting to break into the team. Marc-Andre ter Stegen is just 22 and has already secured a move to Barcelona. Julian Draxler and Matthias Ginter, both just 20, were in the squad in Brazil and are tipped for big things in the future. Schalke teenagers Max Meyer and Leon Goretzka have great potential as well. And don't forget 19-year-old attacking midfielder Serge Gnabry, who took a real step forward for Arsenal last season.
More great young players will follow. And Germany will continue to be a real force. The question therefore is, will anyone catch them? With Spain and Italy in decline, Germany is the clear favorite to win Euro 2016 in France and the Russian World Cup in 2018.
Yesterday could just be the first of many achievements enjoyed by the Germans in the coming years with this group of young, excellent players. Germany has the makings of a dynasty that could enjoy the same 6-year period of success that Spain just did.
And for this embarrassment of riches, all credit should go to to Klinsmann and Loew--the masterminds of German's football revolution a decade ago.
Sunday, July 13, 2014
Will Argentina Finally Beat Germany?
Argentina has faced Germany in the quarter-final stage of the last two World Cups. Jens Lehmann's penalty heroics knocked them out in 2006 and a superb German team performance led to a 4-0 victory in Cape Town four years ago.
This year, Argentina have had the good fortune of avoiding the Germans until the Final. No European team has ever won a World Cup in the Americas. Will Germany be the first?
Germany arrives on a roll, having just destroyed hosts Brazil 7-1 on Tuesday. The Germans started with an early set piece goal, and then passed the ball into the net 4 times in 6 minutes to take a 5-0 lead into halftime.
Watch the highlights of the Argentina/Germany match 4 years ago. The ease with which Germany scored their 2nd, 3rd, and 4th goals. It reminds you of the Brazilian demolition that took place on Tuesday.
Germany does well against South American opposition. They have struggled against more physical tests like Algeria and Ghana who played a direct, attacking style. The whole world knows Argentina has great forwards, but do they have a good enough defense to keep the Germans from dominating yet again?
Germany found most of their success in 2010 down their left hand side, or Argentina's right. In Cape Town, Argentina played Nicolas Otamendi, a center back, out of position on right. Lukas Podolski tore him apart. Now Argentina plays Pablo Zabaleta in that position, arguably the best right back in the world. Consider that problem fixed.
Against Brazil, most of what Germany created came down their right, where Phillip Lahm overlapped Thomas Muller, or quickly through the middle, storming forward in numbers after a midfield tackle. Argentina's left back Marcos Rojo has had a strong World Cup, and Javier Mascherano has been possibly the best player in the tournament in central midfield.
Defensively, Germany might struggle to deal with pace, especially on their left hand side, where Benedikt Howedes is playing out of position as a left back, and Mesut Ozil, who is not a natural winger, is asked to track back and help Howedes defend. Mats Hummels and Per Mertesacker lack pace--they were exposed by Algeria and have not played together for Germany since then. Jerome Boateng sometimes gets caught out of position and is prone to occasional lapses in concentration.
Thats where Messi enters in. Messi is at his best cutting in from the right hand side onto his stronger left foot. Lavezzi provides pace, and so would Aguero if he is fit. Gonzalo Higuain will stay on the shoulder of the last defender and be a threat for through balls in behind a defense that has a vulnerability to through balls. Manuel Neuer has performed admirably as a sweeper keeper, rushing out of his box to make last-ditch clearances. One mistake, however, and Argentina could score easily.
Looking at form, Germany should win this. They are on fire and have easily been the most impressive team in the tournament. They have scored 18 goals and conceded just 4. They've only gone to extra time once in knockout play. And they've never needed penalties.
But looking at the matchup, Argentina seems to have the players who could really test the Germans' weaknesses, perhaps more than any other team in the tournament. Argentina has been stronger in defense than in years' past, and the quality of their attack is unquestioned.
South American teams have done really well in the World Cup for two reasons. First, they are used to the hot, humid conditions. But more importantly, they have enjoyed fantastic support in the stadiums. It was a real shame that 4 of the South American teams got grouped together in the knockout rounds, as I would have expected Chile and Colombia to go further in the tournament against different opponents.
It's a tough match to predict, but when two teams seem to be equal on paper, I give the advantage to the team with a superior goalkeeper. Manuel Neuer is the best goalkeeper in the world. Sergio Romero is nowhere close to that.
So I'll pick Germany. 2-nil.
This year, Argentina have had the good fortune of avoiding the Germans until the Final. No European team has ever won a World Cup in the Americas. Will Germany be the first?
Germany arrives on a roll, having just destroyed hosts Brazil 7-1 on Tuesday. The Germans started with an early set piece goal, and then passed the ball into the net 4 times in 6 minutes to take a 5-0 lead into halftime.
Watch the highlights of the Argentina/Germany match 4 years ago. The ease with which Germany scored their 2nd, 3rd, and 4th goals. It reminds you of the Brazilian demolition that took place on Tuesday.
Germany does well against South American opposition. They have struggled against more physical tests like Algeria and Ghana who played a direct, attacking style. The whole world knows Argentina has great forwards, but do they have a good enough defense to keep the Germans from dominating yet again?
Germany found most of their success in 2010 down their left hand side, or Argentina's right. In Cape Town, Argentina played Nicolas Otamendi, a center back, out of position on right. Lukas Podolski tore him apart. Now Argentina plays Pablo Zabaleta in that position, arguably the best right back in the world. Consider that problem fixed.
Against Brazil, most of what Germany created came down their right, where Phillip Lahm overlapped Thomas Muller, or quickly through the middle, storming forward in numbers after a midfield tackle. Argentina's left back Marcos Rojo has had a strong World Cup, and Javier Mascherano has been possibly the best player in the tournament in central midfield.
Defensively, Germany might struggle to deal with pace, especially on their left hand side, where Benedikt Howedes is playing out of position as a left back, and Mesut Ozil, who is not a natural winger, is asked to track back and help Howedes defend. Mats Hummels and Per Mertesacker lack pace--they were exposed by Algeria and have not played together for Germany since then. Jerome Boateng sometimes gets caught out of position and is prone to occasional lapses in concentration.
Thats where Messi enters in. Messi is at his best cutting in from the right hand side onto his stronger left foot. Lavezzi provides pace, and so would Aguero if he is fit. Gonzalo Higuain will stay on the shoulder of the last defender and be a threat for through balls in behind a defense that has a vulnerability to through balls. Manuel Neuer has performed admirably as a sweeper keeper, rushing out of his box to make last-ditch clearances. One mistake, however, and Argentina could score easily.
Looking at form, Germany should win this. They are on fire and have easily been the most impressive team in the tournament. They have scored 18 goals and conceded just 4. They've only gone to extra time once in knockout play. And they've never needed penalties.
But looking at the matchup, Argentina seems to have the players who could really test the Germans' weaknesses, perhaps more than any other team in the tournament. Argentina has been stronger in defense than in years' past, and the quality of their attack is unquestioned.
South American teams have done really well in the World Cup for two reasons. First, they are used to the hot, humid conditions. But more importantly, they have enjoyed fantastic support in the stadiums. It was a real shame that 4 of the South American teams got grouped together in the knockout rounds, as I would have expected Chile and Colombia to go further in the tournament against different opponents.
It's a tough match to predict, but when two teams seem to be equal on paper, I give the advantage to the team with a superior goalkeeper. Manuel Neuer is the best goalkeeper in the world. Sergio Romero is nowhere close to that.
So I'll pick Germany. 2-nil.
Thursday, June 19, 2014
World Cup Ramble: Spain and England Choke
This World Cup has been amazing. One of the most entertaining tournaments I can remember. Except when Greece is playing.
Spain Out
The biggest story so far is that after 1 week, Spain has been eliminated. The cup holders and winners of the past 2 European Championships got outscored 7-1 in their first two matches against Holland adn Chile.
The Spanish players looked old, tired, and complacent. Diego Costa looked unfit and clueless and the rest of the team looked like they had no idea how to play with him. Xabi Alonso and Sergi Busquets were awful as the shield in front of a defense that suddenly looks very average without Puyol. Sergio Ramos lost his concentration frequently, Jordi Alba was awful, and Iker Casillas faces competition from the Russian Igor Akinfeev (Fabio Capello's Robert Green 2.0) for worst goalkeeper in the tournament. Spain was dreadful.
Perhaps some of that had to do with tactics. Spain played two different teams who play with 3 center backs. Mexico, Chile, Holland, Costa Rica, and Argentina all deploy 3. Their record in the tournament so far? 7 wins, 1 draw, and 0 losses.
Think back to the FA Cup Final against Hull. Olivier Giroud struggled mightily in the first half as the lone striker against Hull's 3 central defenders. Arsenal brought Sanogo on to be a second striker and finally took control of the game.
The 4-2-3-1 Spain has made famous for 6 years might have finally been found out.
England Nearly Out as Well
What formation did England play?
Two 2-1 losses means England is hanging on to the tournament by a thread. If Costa Rica can get something against Italy tomorrow, the Three Lions will be eliminated.
I don't get how this is a surprise to anyone. After not even qualifying for Euro 2008, England was extremely average in a very favorable group in 2010, only beating Slovenia, and not much better in Euro 2012.
England's best player has been Leighton Baines. That says it all really.
The team was built around 5 Liverpool players, the most ever by any one club for England at a World Cup. This was understandable, as the 5 combined to lose 0 European matches all season.
Gerrard and Henderson, the "shield" protecting Liverpool's defense all season, were asked to do the same job for England. Which made sense because Liverpool conceded 50 goals in the league this year. The 8th best defensive record in the league. Top half!
Gerrard, the captain, has been England's worst player. He's useless. He can't run, tackle, win the ball in the air, or even pass the ball well anymore. He can always find Suarez in dangerous positions, though.
I can't help but think the team missed Theo Walcott. Danny Welbeck is not a winger. Walcott (or even Oxlade-Chamberlain) would have improved this team immensely. Someone who knew how to keep spacing and make intelligent runs off the ball.
Wayne Rooney has been poor yet again. He hasn't played well for 3 years. He's the most overrated player in the world. I don't expect him to play much for Louis Van Gaal.
Rooney can't play as a lone striker or as a winger, and when in his favored #10 role he struggles to finish or create chances for his teammates like he did when he was 20. England was better against Italy, with Sterling in the middle and Rooney on the left wing, than they were today--but even in the Italy match Italy exploited England's left hand side ruthlessly because Rooney was taken to school by Torino right back Marco Darmian earning just his second cap.
Daniel Sturridge scored a lot of goals this year, goals set up by Luis Suarez. England needed Rooney to play like Suarez, too. But Rooney plays like a Greek.
Waynios Hairplugopolous.
In my opinion, England's best formation would have been a 4-3-1-2 (which Liverpool used frequently this year with great success) adding a third cental midfielder (Wilshere or Barkley) to make up for Gerrard's lack of mobility, playing Sterling in the free role behind Welbeck and Sturridge, and benching Mr. Hairplugopolous.
Spain Out
The biggest story so far is that after 1 week, Spain has been eliminated. The cup holders and winners of the past 2 European Championships got outscored 7-1 in their first two matches against Holland adn Chile.
The Spanish players looked old, tired, and complacent. Diego Costa looked unfit and clueless and the rest of the team looked like they had no idea how to play with him. Xabi Alonso and Sergi Busquets were awful as the shield in front of a defense that suddenly looks very average without Puyol. Sergio Ramos lost his concentration frequently, Jordi Alba was awful, and Iker Casillas faces competition from the Russian Igor Akinfeev (Fabio Capello's Robert Green 2.0) for worst goalkeeper in the tournament. Spain was dreadful.
Perhaps some of that had to do with tactics. Spain played two different teams who play with 3 center backs. Mexico, Chile, Holland, Costa Rica, and Argentina all deploy 3. Their record in the tournament so far? 7 wins, 1 draw, and 0 losses.
Think back to the FA Cup Final against Hull. Olivier Giroud struggled mightily in the first half as the lone striker against Hull's 3 central defenders. Arsenal brought Sanogo on to be a second striker and finally took control of the game.
The 4-2-3-1 Spain has made famous for 6 years might have finally been found out.
England Nearly Out as Well
What formation did England play?
Two 2-1 losses means England is hanging on to the tournament by a thread. If Costa Rica can get something against Italy tomorrow, the Three Lions will be eliminated.
I don't get how this is a surprise to anyone. After not even qualifying for Euro 2008, England was extremely average in a very favorable group in 2010, only beating Slovenia, and not much better in Euro 2012.
England's best player has been Leighton Baines. That says it all really.
The team was built around 5 Liverpool players, the most ever by any one club for England at a World Cup. This was understandable, as the 5 combined to lose 0 European matches all season.
Gerrard and Henderson, the "shield" protecting Liverpool's defense all season, were asked to do the same job for England. Which made sense because Liverpool conceded 50 goals in the league this year. The 8th best defensive record in the league. Top half!
Gerrard, the captain, has been England's worst player. He's useless. He can't run, tackle, win the ball in the air, or even pass the ball well anymore. He can always find Suarez in dangerous positions, though.
I can't help but think the team missed Theo Walcott. Danny Welbeck is not a winger. Walcott (or even Oxlade-Chamberlain) would have improved this team immensely. Someone who knew how to keep spacing and make intelligent runs off the ball.
Wayne Rooney has been poor yet again. He hasn't played well for 3 years. He's the most overrated player in the world. I don't expect him to play much for Louis Van Gaal.
Rooney can't play as a lone striker or as a winger, and when in his favored #10 role he struggles to finish or create chances for his teammates like he did when he was 20. England was better against Italy, with Sterling in the middle and Rooney on the left wing, than they were today--but even in the Italy match Italy exploited England's left hand side ruthlessly because Rooney was taken to school by Torino right back Marco Darmian earning just his second cap.
Daniel Sturridge scored a lot of goals this year, goals set up by Luis Suarez. England needed Rooney to play like Suarez, too. But Rooney plays like a Greek.
Waynios Hairplugopolous.
In my opinion, England's best formation would have been a 4-3-1-2 (which Liverpool used frequently this year with great success) adding a third cental midfielder (Wilshere or Barkley) to make up for Gerrard's lack of mobility, playing Sterling in the free role behind Welbeck and Sturridge, and benching Mr. Hairplugopolous.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)